Ideas, discussions about all topics - no matter how brilliant or stupid they are. Place for hobby-psychatrists, hobby-architects, hobby-scientists, hobby-whatever...
- Let's assume that some thing like destiny exists, and that things happen for a reason. This would mean that if things are "supposed to be or to happen", there must be some sense behind it.
- Secondly, I assume that "free will" and something like destiny cannot co-exist without interference.
I'd split destiny roughly into 3 types:
1) individual
The deeper meaning behind happenings are only meant to affect one individuum's life.
e.g.: Someone misses his train and because of that the meets the love of his life. So destiny takes care of every single one.
2) local
The sum of a limited number of events in a certain scope leads to something which was "meant to happen".
In this case, destiny does NOT care about the individual, but makes sure that the result of a combination of actions serve some purpose.
3) global
Things happening are not meant to make sense for an individual or in a local context, but they serve a "higher purpose" which results of the sum of all actions in the whole system.
I'm not just trying to be smart here, but I'm trying to point out a philosophical problem I have when people tell me that there is a "higher force" which has a plan which we might not be able to understand... (e.g. "God")
...so I started thinking about:
"If that was true, would it comply with what I see around me - or not?"
Even if there was interference by someone/something on a higher level, and this 'higher-whatsoever' would be fine with overlapping destinies, as long as it was able to finish some sort of plan for an individual, there'd be one more (sad) conclusion:
- some people's life may suffer from someone else's destiny.
...but this means that some people's life is worth less than that of others.